Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504ZA
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '24 at 02:45
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 165
2-Core 317
94% 182 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 509
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 286D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 15.9
10% 14.7 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 13.1
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme FORESEE P709F128G 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0527B0P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 351 245 57 51 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,043
Write 389
Mixed 484
SusWrite 197
116% 528 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 26.8
155% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 244
168% 208 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504ZA_F1504ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback