ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 21JNS0F400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	Lenovo 21JNS0F400 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 21JNS0F400
Memory	23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '24 at 23:30
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-13700H 4,359 User benchmarks, average bench 104% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 74.8 1-Core 201 2-Core 402 116% 226 Pts	4-Core 567 8-Core 818 87% 693 Pts	64-Core 1,203 74% 1,203 Pts
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 111%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 14,602 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Legend(17AA 50D1) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 22.6 Reflection 29.5 Parallax 28.3 18% 26.8 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 32.5 Splatting 22.1 22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00-1201 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 274% 884GB free (System drive) Firmware: 73116101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2732 Write 2,430 Mixed 2,099 539% 2,421 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 74.1 257% 88.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,016 DQ Write 370 DQ Mixed 638 486% 675 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 514%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3340MF88HBF-3200 Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 36.8 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 40.5 SC Mixed 27.2 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	60	16"	1280 720	LEN41B5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback