Asus X99-M WS/SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS/SE  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 18:59
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 233
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 720
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3605) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 546.33
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 304 307 297 216 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 433
Mixed 407
SusWrite 274
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 46.1
143% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 331
249% 334 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 66 67 280 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 450
Write 282
Mixed 345
SusWrite 149
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 39.1
132% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 326
248% 337 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 462%
Samsung 850 PRO 256G 187GB
44GB free
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 196 151 155 137 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 461
Write 409
Mixed 337
SusWrite 162
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 35.6
119% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 339
255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avexir DDR4-2400 CL16 4GB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 38.2
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 21.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 6 60 34.1" 3440 1377 GSM76D8 34UM95
Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback