Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics274% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 15:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$590
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 216
2-Core 423
125% 242 Pts
4-Core 841
8-Core 1,611
146% 1,226 Pts
64-Core 3,659
226% 3,659 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Asus(1043 0506) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
274% Outstanding
Lighting 358
Reflection 495
Parallax 826
292% 560 fps
MRender 551
Gravity 291
Splatting 493
367% 445 fps
Poor: 225%
This bench: 274%
Great: 292%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$149
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,974
Write 4,344
Mixed 3,227
791% 3,515 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 79.8
258% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,622
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 1391
1,039% 1,390 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
295% Outstanding
MC Read 201
MC Write 66.3
MC Mixed 82.1
333% 116 GB/s
SC Read 48.1
SC Write 74.5
SC Mixed 59
173% 60.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 156%
This bench: 295%
Great: 295%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 5R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 13% 79 215 57 60 24" 1280 720 GSM56CC W2442
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,477
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback