Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 251%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 437%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics324% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive406% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H13SSL-N
Memory496.3 GB free of 512 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '24 at 12:12
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User MLT-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core
CPU, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.5% Very good
Memory 68
1-Core 121
2-Core 245
78% 145 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 976
86% 731 Pts
64-Core 4,910
304% 4,910 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
MSI(1462 510B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
324% Outstanding
Lighting 470
Reflection 587
Parallax 820
383% 625 fps
MRender 536
Gravity 578
Splatting 309
372% 474 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 324%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3613 3603 3574 3562 3554 3559 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 1953
Write 3770
Mixed 3,071
SusWrite 3,578
705% 3,093 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 71.6
229% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 884
651% 860 MB/s
Poor: 268%
This bench: 406%
Great: 635%
Intel SSDSC2KB038TZ 4TB
216GB free
Firmware: 7CV10120
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 428 426 426 428 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 419
Write 428
Mixed 323
SusWrite 427
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 29.7
99% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 252
195% 264 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 105%
Intel SSDSC2KB038TZ 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 7CV10120
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 448 447 448 449 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 448
Write 444
Mixed 336
SusWrite 448
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 28.9
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 282
218% 293 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 105%
Seagate Basic 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 92 91 94 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 78.2
Write 116
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 90.7
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
187% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M321R8GA0BB0-CQKZJ 8x31.9GB
8 of 12 slots used
255GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
390% Outstanding
MC Read 145
MC Write 184
MC Mixed 159
464% 163 GB/s
SC Read 40
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 51.4
131% 45.7 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 245%
This bench: 390%
Great: 390%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 26.9" 1280 720 APPAE3A StudioDisplay
Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback