Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '24 at 11:44
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 660
72% 569 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 82
49% 67.5 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 44.9
46% 57.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Twinmos SSD 1TB
910GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 382
Mixed 385
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 26.3
118% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 44.5
86% 168 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 356%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8JT 859B CB8GU2666.C8ET 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 24.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 49 60 23.5" 1920 1009 VSCD824 VA2431 Series
Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback