Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 22:03
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 221
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 638
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.4% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 64.5
55% 67.4 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 68
Splatting 62.7
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 181 8.6 67 119 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 489
Write 456
Mixed 373
SusWrite 124
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 36
127% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 195
182% 281 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
216GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 43 43 49 54 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 206
Write 31.8
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 48
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 109%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 55 64 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 14.7
Write 40.8
Mixed 21
SusWrite 57.8
25% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.1
56% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 46 214 58 60 24" 1280 720 ACI2498 VS248
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback