Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-15K1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star Cyborg 15 A12VE
MotherboardMSI MS-15K1  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230406
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 21 '24 at 01:14
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 56.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 256
72% 139 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 716
77% 611 Pts
64-Core 845
52% 845 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13B9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 13.1
9% 14 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNV2S4000G 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK1N.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 587 873 969 427 274 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 257
Write 1,580
Mixed 181
SusWrite 555
148% 643 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 63.5
184% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 735
DQ Mixed 834
625% 837 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 140%
Great: 535%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 23.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 23 60 36.1" 1280 720 HEC0000 7Series55
Typical MS-15K1 Builds (Compare 1,341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-15K1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback