Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-A  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 103
42% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 160
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Asus(1043 0462) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 14.2
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 9.1
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S650 240GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0419B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 102 68 57 51 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 434
Write 355
Mixed 364
SusWrite 110
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 17.7
99% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 30.5
67% 136 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1600, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 75 23.8" 1280 720 OOO0000 TE-24FHD8
Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback