Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82WM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82WM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 22 '24 at 01:05
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 70.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 306
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,045
100% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,643
102% 1,643 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Legend(17AA 3C53) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.05.19
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 12.1
6% 10.5 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 19.9
11% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
800GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,842
Write 3,422
Mixed 3,104
701% 3,123 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 104
347% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,392
DQ Write 1,102
DQ Mixed 1,240
930% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 201% Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 37.9
112% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 33.4
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 35.1
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 108%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 16" 1280 720 CSO161D
Typical 82WM Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82WM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback