Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500XV
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 07:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 30.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 324
84% 173 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 836
88% 707 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 3258) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.38
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 36.8
17% 26 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 37.3
24% 28.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,164
Write 1,411
Mixed 952
263% 1,176 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 45.6
154% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 720
497% 631 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 337%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 49
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 0R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 15% 53 181 14 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback