Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231009
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 23:27
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N97
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 189
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 335
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5379
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 6.7
3% 6.6 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 8.1
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,262
Write 1,216
Mixed 1,158
271% 1,212 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 66.2
218% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 482
DQ Mixed 592
452% 618 MB/s
Poor: 255% Great: 506%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
29GB free
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 151
Mixed 130
54% 247 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 24.9
109% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 69.2
90% 170 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 91%
Rs512gss D310 512GB
456GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 382
Write 323
Mixed 322
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 17
66% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 25.5
33% 63.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 18
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 35 60 23.1" 1280 720 KNH2A3B 10.1' monitor
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback