Today's hottest deals

Mitac MZ1-10ADP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMitac MZ1-10ADP  (all builds)
MotherboardMiTAC MZ1-10ADP
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 00:01
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 212
2-Core 418
121% 235 Pts
4-Core 813
8-Core 1,360
132% 1,086 Pts
64-Core 2,619
162% 2,619 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A6000
Nvidia(10DE 1459) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 393
Parallax 294
238% 326 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 283
Splatting 196
215% 272 fps
Poor: 174%
This bench: 204%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TMTE662T2 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B8T4EA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,722
Write 1,734
Mixed 1,475
436% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 84.1
319% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 1,071
DQ Mixed 469
540% 927 MB/s
Poor: 202% Great: 303%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
423GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 524
Write 532
Mixed 469
114% 508 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 28.3
89% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 221
164% 216 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS4GSA64V8E 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
164% Outstanding
MC Read 65.6
MC Write 65.7
MC Mixed 62.4
184% 64.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 28.3
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 164%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 23 216 58 60 23" 1280 720 HPN335C HP E230t
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback