Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC4_FX507ZC4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive485% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC4_FX507ZC4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZC4
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 03:45
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 63.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 345
100% 194 Pts
4-Core 668
8-Core 1,078
107% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,598
99% 1,598 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1673) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 22.1
15% 21.3 fps
MRender 19.2
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 16.1
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3326 3399 3421 2630 665 549 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
485% Outstanding
Read 3,725
Write 3,594
Mixed 2,445
SusWrite 2,332
678% 3024 MB/s
4K Read 83
4K Write 258
4K Mixed 108
400% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,808
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,530
1,164% 1,577 MB/s
Poor: 198%
This bench: 485%
Great: 485%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Kingston 9905795-002.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 20 97 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC4_FX507ZC4 Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZC4_FX507ZC4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback