Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime9 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 17:28
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 120
55% 88 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 176
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 11.8
7% 11.5 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWSSD128GS2T 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 57 68 58 67 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 289
Write 83.5
Mixed 219
SusWrite 66.7
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 12.5
82% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 16.4
22% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
456GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 135 133 135 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 52
SusWrite 134
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DEXP8GD3UD16 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 75 19" 1280 961 GSM4B31 L1918S
Typical FM2A75M-DGS Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback