Today's hottest deals

Asrock H470M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H470M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 222
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 687
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$280
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 112
Parallax 96.8
131% 123 fps
MRender 77.3
Gravity 70
Splatting 44.4
50% 63.9 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 103%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX256GSSDSATA3 256GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 325 20 139 87 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 440
Write 383
Mixed 387
SusWrite 107
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 19.8
103% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 30.6
82% 169 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
110GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 108 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 155
Write 156
Mixed 71
SusWrite 109
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 98%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
7GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.4 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 746
Write 0.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.4
126% 189 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Mixed 0
212% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung DX16GDDR4AA3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 25.2
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 0P 3R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 17% 88 193 14 60 23" 1920 1009 HWP327A HP E232
Typical H470M-HDV Builds (Compare 603 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H470M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback