Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C58
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240227
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 19:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 7.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 54.1
1-Core 166
2-Core 319
92% 180 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 935
94% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,406
87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
HP(103C 8C58) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5008
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 29.9
16% 23 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 28.4
20% 23.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,239
Write 1,847
Mixed 1,551
417% 1,879 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 57.4
180% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 604
410% 512 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 533%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56BK7BX068 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
172% Outstanding
MC Read 68
MC Write 68.4
MC Mixed 72.8
199% 69.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 30.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 172%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 14" 1280 720 SDC4197
Typical OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: HP OMEN Transcend Gaming Laptop 14-fb0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback