Compaq(intel Default

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq(intel Default  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 21:45
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 143
47% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 269
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CSE80A1A100-512G 512GB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0327A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 264 310 296 260 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 355
Write 304
Mixed 303
SusWrite 284
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 8.8
38% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 50.2
95% 187 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Mic Electronics MGSI416G26.C19 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 8% 37 64 50 60 15.6" 1280 720 BOE0747
Typical Default Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Compaq(intel Default

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback