Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '24 at 02:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$117
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 325
101% 190 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 1,017
102% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Asus(1043 05E3) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 129
Parallax 229
95% 158 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 123
Splatting 188
146% 178 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX500-512-80-G2 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1615 941 322 323 323 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,298
Write 1663
Mixed 1400
SusWrite 641
282% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 63
206% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,294
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 1,117
834% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 205%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A IRX3200D464L16SA/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.3% Very good
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 24.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 29% 21 208 56 180 23.8" 1920 1080 GBT2403 G24F 2
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback