Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U 6,833 User benchmarks, average bench 67% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 25.2 1-Core 135 2-Core 255 68% 138 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 648 66% 534 Pts	64-Core 920 57% 920 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 36,301 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.1.1 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 16.2 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 21.6 13% 17.5 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 20.4 Splatting 19.6 14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB 13,594 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7L2QFXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1287 443 239 136 178 160 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	174% Outstanding	Read 1,548 Write 1,534 Mixed 1,302 SusWrite 407 268% 1,198 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 45.7 153% 52.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,035 DQ Write 739 DQ Mixed 880 659% 885 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 174% Great: 227%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Adata 4JQA-0622AD 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.9 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	60	15.5"	1280 720	AUO369F

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 12%, 36,301 samples	243x

SSD
CL1-4D256 256GBSsstcBench 118%, 2,132 samples	166x
IM2P33F4 256GBNvmeBench 136%, 233 samples	15x
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	14x

RAM
Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Brazil 8GBSmartBench 67%, 147 samples	74x
Brazil SMS4WEC3C0K0446SCG Adata 4JQA-0622AC 8GBSmartBench 65%, 50 samples	22x
AD4S3200J4G22-B Smart Brazil 8GBAdataBench 66%, 50 samples	21x