ADD TO PC
BUILD

Pcspecialist MMX 8 Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Pcspecialist MMX 8 Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI
Memory	49.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20240202
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '24 at 18:00
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$398 5,220 User benchmarks, average bench 117% AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 194 2-Core 382 119% 224 Pts	4-Core 762 8-Core 1,315 126% 1,039 Pts	64-Core 1,820 113% 1,820 Pts
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 122%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520 45,585 User benchmarks, average bench 190% Zotac(19DA 2714) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Lighting 285 Reflection 269 Parallax 284 232% 280 fps	MRender 362 Gravity 245 Splatting 192 209% 266 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 205%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Evo M.2 1TB-$79 413 User benchmarks, average bench 311% 812GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0B2QKXJ7 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,908 Write 3,488 Mixed 2,306 580% 2,567 MB/s	4K Read 49.4 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 72.3 244% 88.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,801 DQ Write 1218 DQ Mixed 1,504 1,124% 1,508 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 395%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$105 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 2TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,452 Write 1510 Mixed 1,633 412% 1,865 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 70.5 227% 76.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,897 DQ Write 1,531 DQ Mixed 1,697 1,275% 1,708 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Sandisk Portable SSD 1TB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 560GB free Firmware: 0305 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 387 Write 370 Mixed 153 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 13 50% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 33.5 47% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK5X32G2A48C40A2 2x31.5GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	MC Read 70.5 MC Write 54.5 MC Mixed 61.5 178% 62.2 GB/s	SC Read 52.7 SC Write 60.6 SC Mixed 54.3 160% 55.9 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 171%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	100	34.1"	1280 720	SAM7119 LC34G55T

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback