Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN17-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN17-41  (all builds)
MotherboardPHX Spacia_PEH
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231006
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 03:37
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 156
56% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 560
51% 426 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Acer(1025 1677) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.70.06
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 50.4
24% 32.2 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 57.2
35% 40 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1272 791 817 768 845 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 3,598
Write 1,331
Mixed 844
SusWrite 961
368% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 53.8
190% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 426
DQ Mixed 564
405% 522 MB/s
Poor: 284%
This bench: 284%
Great: 510%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 41.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 32.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 165 17.3" 1280 720 BOE0B7C
Typical Nitro AN17-41 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Nitro AN17-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback