MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 20:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 155
2-Core 309
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 864
89% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Asus(1043 05E1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 141
Parallax 238
97% 166 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 127
Splatting 195
150% 183 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 122 85 84 82 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 501
Write 109
Mixed 212
SusWrite 104
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 36.5
141% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 165
145% 224 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 128%
WD Green 2.5 240GB
141GB free
Firmware: 42059100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 134 123 123 102 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 455
Write 408
Mixed 402
SusWrite 164
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 36.8
122% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 51.2
85% 169 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-SBKD35 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 24.2
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 2R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 16% 101 186 10 144 23.8" 1920 1017 SAM7178 LS24AG30x
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback