Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502VJ
Memory25.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230525
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 10:34
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 57.3
1-Core 176
2-Core 353
99% 196 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,144
111% 911 Pts
64-Core 1,695
105% 1,695 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 3158) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 28.7
20% 27.1 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 21.9
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,782
Write 1,346
Mixed 1,117
314% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 77.3
254% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 575
438% 603 MB/s
Poor: 124% Great: 387%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
211GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 85.6
Mixed 87.1
126% 107 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.6
147% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 39GB
4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 26.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Typical ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Asus ASUSLaptop_Q540VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback