Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0B50051US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo F0B50051US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Larne CRB
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150629
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 04:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 46.8
31% 44.3 Pts
4-Core 88.2
8-Core 96.7
12% 92.4 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3639) 992MB
Ram: 992MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 112 86 111 117 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 119
Write 54.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 105
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-A8G-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 7
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 13 2 60 21.5" 1280 720 LEN8000 LBG AIO PC
Typical F0B50051US Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0B50051US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $41
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback