Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A20
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 08:30
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 244
76% 144 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 567
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8A20) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 12.1
8% 12.6 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 15.6
14% 17 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1234 1182 415 417 399 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,613
Write 1,381
Mixed 1,128
SusWrite 670
268% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.5
198% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,301
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 988
752% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 213%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD416G32002S 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN153B
Typical Laptop 15s-fq5xxx Builds (Compare 1,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq5xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback