Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory44.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 05:26
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 978
98% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 48.6
31% 39.5 fps
MRender 27.6
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 21.5
23% 29 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 512GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80004E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 602 603 608 607 587 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,526
Write 837
Mixed 1,300
SusWrite 633
240% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 57.5
188% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 321
421% 755 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 201%
Great: 215%
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
111GB free
Firmware: MVT0300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 318 318 319 320 320 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 494
Mixed 437
SusWrite 332
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 53.9
177% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK Hynix HMA82GU6CJR8N-VK 48GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 31.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 32.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 18.9" 1280 720 ACI19A9 ASUS VW193T
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback