Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-15K1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Cyborg 15 A13VE
MotherboardMSI MS-15K1  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime18.8 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 17:02
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13420H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 197
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 384
45% 347 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 62%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13B9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 9.8
6% 9.9 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 10.8
5% 4.93 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 5.46%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1335 1441 843 74 77 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,706
Write 1,551
Mixed 1,335
SusWrite 642
293% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 30.2
227% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 563
DQ Mixed 615
462% 619 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 200%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 40
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.7
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0A2
Typical MS-15K1 Builds (Compare 1,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-15K1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback