HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 10:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 600
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
PNY(196E 1313) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74% Very good
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 132
Parallax 93
76% 106 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 88.5
Splatting 76.6
70% 87 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 74 84 77 67 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 223
Write 89
Mixed 160
SusWrite 76.7
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.7
55% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 47.5
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 32.6
26% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 73%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
587GB free
Firmware: HP75
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 187 186 186 184 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 173
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 184
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 12 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 57.6
Write 12
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 12.8
24% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
105% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB - [0x9E02] CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 23.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF LM24-E200A
Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback