Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 246%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 271%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics245% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 01:15
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 174
2-Core 348
107% 202 Pts
4-Core 649
8-Core 1,227
112% 938 Pts
64-Core 2,084
129% 2,084 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
Sapphire(1DA2 471E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
245% Outstanding
Lighting 313
Reflection 455
Parallax 646
255% 471 fps
MRender 482
Gravity 260
Splatting 460
332% 400 fps
Poor: 176%
This bench: 245%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPW004T 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN13683
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1365 1814 1857 1927 1936 1948 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,184
Write 2,184
Mixed 2,056
SusWrite 1,808
464% 2,058 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 77.7
254% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 723
600% 879 MB/s
Poor: 320%
This bench: 320%
Great: 642%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
622GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2352 2988 3046 3062 3051 1865 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2,712
Write 3,026
Mixed 2,899
SusWrite 2,727
642% 2,841 MB/s
4K Read 71.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 90.5
292% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,101
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 802
621% 860 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 406%
Great: 508%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$147
2TB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 436 437 437 437 437 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 446
Mixed 377
SusWrite 436
93% 409 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 51.2
168% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 118
151% 268 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 250GB-$75
218GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 200 196 198 198 198 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 501
Write 339
Mixed 208
SusWrite 208
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 30.9
123% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 190
166% 246 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 100%
MD2000GSA3272DVR 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA31E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 114 104 121 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 61
SusWrite 116
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: D785
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 148 149 151 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 139
Write 149
Mixed 111
SusWrite 151
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
393% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate One Touch HDD 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 132 128 135 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 131
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
232% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX4M4K3600C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 39.8
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 37.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 34" 1280 720 AUS3435 ASUS VG34V
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 14,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $845
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback