Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2176 x 1224 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 14:07
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 163
2-Core 305
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,058
97% 815 Pts
64-Core 2,044
126% 2,044 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 243
Parallax 277
228% 267 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 236
Splatting 185
203% 258 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 196%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$150
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3256 3483 3598 2274 1892 1906 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 1,782
Write 3,488
Mixed 2,833
SusWrite 2,735
618% 2,710 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 64.8
206% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 937
692% 918 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 343%
Great: 587%
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB
368GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 62 63 63 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 119%
Seagate FireCuda HDD 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 70 68 69 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 102
Write 126
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 69.5
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
211% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST8000NC0002-1XX112 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: CN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 92 88 88 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 50
Write 12
Mixed 15
SusWrite 90.5
30% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung Type-C 257GB
109GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 386
Write 108
Mixed 105
199% 199 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 3
298% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 107%
Samsung Type-C 257GB
111GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 2.8 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer 125GB
110GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 1.6 2.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 62.1
Write 18.4
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 12.8
32% 29 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
62% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 38.8
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 33.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 170 27" 1280 720 HKC2736 27E3Q
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 14,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $869
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback