HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime26.4 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 10:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 185
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 554
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 18
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.5
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 375 180 187 153 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 481
Write 396
Mixed 380
SusWrite 220
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 18.7
98% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 32.7
74% 149 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAONS02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 122 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 120
Write 124
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 120
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x] DDR4 PC 16G 3200 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 6 60 27" 1920 1057 LHCFFFF 27H2G
Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback