Asus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics360% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory85.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 20:11
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X 24-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 67.5
1-Core 169
2-Core 313
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,273
109% 933 Pts
64-Core 5102
316% 5102 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
360% Outstanding
Lighting 558
Reflection 582
Parallax 726
455% 622 fps
MRender 529
Gravity 571
Splatting 294
363% 465 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 360%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$130
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,062
Write 1,853
Mixed 767
276% 1,227 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48
149% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,441
DQ Write 1,240
DQ Mixed 1,229
952% 1,303 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560R32-32 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
392% Outstanding
MC Read 258
MC Write 100
MC Mixed 129
465% 163 GB/s
SC Read 33.8
SC Write 66.7
SC Mixed 46
140% 48.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 174%
This bench: 392%
Great: 392%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 0 60 27" 1280 720 SAM7081 SAMSUNG
Typical Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 336%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS TRX50-SAGE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 241% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback