Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory30.3 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230927
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 23:19
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 724
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Gigabyte(1458 411D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 2
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 2
2% 21.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 54.3
47% 58 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 500GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,519
Write 2,296
Mixed 2,033
509% 2,283 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 59.9
211% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,189
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 972
738% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 238% Great: 499%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 40GB
3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 23.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 3R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 21% 14 210 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 MSI5DA6 MSI G32C4W
Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback