MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231016
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 15:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 77.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 310
87% 168 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,064
104% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,468
91% 1,468 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3300 MHz, MLim: 4800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 251
Parallax 165
142% 197 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 139
Splatting 116
123% 156 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 128%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-01T-G2 1TB
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 429 431 424 180 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 272
Write 103
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 331
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 11.6
53% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 14.3
11% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 141 136 138 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 122
Write 138
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFRA32A.M16FR GR3200D464L22/16G 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 33.7
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 32.1
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 180 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR0CD8 XF240Y M3
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback