Hp-pavilion AY022AA-ABL p6330f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion AY022AA-ABL p6330f  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 17:20
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44% Average
Memory 60
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 126
50% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 165
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
EVGA(3842 2643) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 8
Parallax 9.2
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 28 31 39 34 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.2
Write 54
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 35
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
56% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 76
Write 105
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 96.5
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CD04CD04 F3 DDR3 1333 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 0" 1280 720 WET02E5 WD40FW1610
Typical AY022AA-ABL p6330f Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion AY022AA-ABL p6330f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback