HP ProLiant DL385 G7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP ProLiant DL385 G7  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory29.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '16 at 10:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6176 SE
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 67.2
35% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 270
24% 202 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 294GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.64
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 446
Write 452
Mixed 241
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 1.91
33% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 9.43
17% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 102%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 8GB-$15
4GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.66% Terrible
Read 28.7
Write 12.3
Mixed 9.46
18% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.99
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.009
24% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.66%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24x4GB
24 of 24 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant DL385 G7 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant DL385 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback