Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics44.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive498% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 17:41
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$476
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 100
1-Core 197
2-Core 394
123% 230 Pts
4-Core 786
8-Core 1,319
128% 1,053 Pts
64-Core 1,846
114% 1,846 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.2% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 50.3
46% 55.6 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 48.7
40% 48.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$135
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620361WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3806 2663 2487 2293 2232 2126 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
498% Outstanding
Read 4,252
Write 4185
Mixed 3220
SusWrite 2,601
800% 3,564 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 74.9
265% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2,092
DQ Write 1,870
DQ Mixed 2,022
1,505% 1,994 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 498%
Great: 666%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
401GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,556
Write 2,356
Mixed 1,927
508% 2,279 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 72.7
243% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 2,000
DQ Write 1,653
DQ Mixed 1,803
1,357% 1,819 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
184GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 301
Write 484
Mixed 330
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 30.8
141% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 160
172% 287 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
219% Outstanding
MC Read 83.2
MC Write 69.8
MC Mixed 83.4
225% 78.8 GB/s
SC Read 57.9
SC Write 74.6
SC Mixed 69.3
192% 67.3 GB/s
Latency 33.5
119% 33.5 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 219%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774B LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback