Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231016
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 02:33
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 83.4
35% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 196
20% 161 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.14057.5006
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 9.3
5% 8.2 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MCR-RPRS-480 480GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0630B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 21 21 19 19 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 396
Write 25.2
Mixed 195
SusWrite 21.5
34% 159 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 14.1
69% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 81.1
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 26
41% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GALADIUS 300 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59CA 2D HD LG TV
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback