Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory	3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121217
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	May 18 '24 at 18:41
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 3,610 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 97 2-Core 176 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 404 44% 349 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 38.9 Parallax 37.5 29% 37.4 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 26.2 27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB 3,562 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1107A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 42 54 61 42 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 407 Write 345 Mixed 168 SusWrite 81.8 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 9.1 60% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 15.4 22% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 93%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 104GB free Firmware: 01.01S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 66 46 64 67 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 96.6 Write 102 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 66.3 65% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-CH9 M391B5273DH0-YK0 M391B5273CH0-CH9 M391B5273DH0-YK0 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 10 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 50: 0P 5R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
50%	22%	83	207	44	60	23.5"	1280 720	PHLC107 PHL 246E7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

CPU
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples	16x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	12x
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 800 samples	4x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x
860 Pro 1TBSamsung $300Bench 112%, 8,179 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 2x4GBMicronBench 53%, 4,196 samples	5x
M391B5273CH0-CH9 M391B5273DH0-YK0 M391B5273CH0-CH9 M391B5273DH0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 46%, 3 samples	3x
M391B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U7BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 16GBSamsungBench 54%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $386

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363