Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics245% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 02:50
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14400F-$195
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 69.3
1-Core 168
2-Core 334
99% 191 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 976
98% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,670
103% 1,670 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 92%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
MSI(1462 513E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
245% Outstanding
Lighting 356
Reflection 348
Parallax 374
290% 359 fps
MRender 496
Gravity 304
Splatting 218
264% 340 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 245%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
696GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK1N.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,479
Write 2,733
Mixed 2051
472% 2,088 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 292
4K Mixed 66.9
271% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 592
611% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.2
Write 6
Mixed 6.7
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$113
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 58.3
MC Mixed 50.9
155% 54.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 26.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 138%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 60 23.5" 1280 720 MSI3EA2 MSI MAG241C
Typical GA-B760 GAMING X Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback