Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-E  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 19:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 216
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 648
62% 511 Pts
64-Core 847
52% 847 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2310) ≥ 4GB; PowerColor Fighter 12GB DDR6
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12044.3
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 135
Parallax 263
107% 176 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 144
Splatting 198
155% 189 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 119%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK1N.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 572 759 552 710 187 776 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 894
Write 524
Mixed 871
SusWrite 593
162% 721 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 61.1
132% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 779
575% 768 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 352%
Adata SU630 480GB
245GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 6.3 36 3.8 81 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 397
Write 417
Mixed 6
SusWrite 68
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.3
33% 8.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
155GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 446 446 449 447 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 462
Mixed 285
SusWrite 447
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 40.3
137% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 274
230% 333 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical PRIME A320M-E Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback