MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7865
MotherboardMSI AM1I (MS-7865)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141224
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 13 '18 at 21:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5370 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 68.2
35% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 137
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
XFX(1682 7240) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.68% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 9.03
6% 8.22 fps
MRender 6.05
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 7.52
6% 6.65 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 473
Write 305
Mixed 340
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 9.37
64% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 45.5
58% 105 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 95%
WD WD10S21X-24R1BT0-SSHD-8GB 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: 03.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 102
Write 117
Mixed 107
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.25
85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 99U5471-002.A01LF 6GB
800, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.8
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1I (MS-7865) Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI AM1I (MS-7865)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback