Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Lite AL15-41

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire Lite AL15-41  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Lite AL15-41
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 11:43
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 48.7
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 140
49% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 434
50% 389 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Clevo(1558 A600) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.37.05
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 11
Parallax 10.5
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison ESO512GHLCA1-E9C 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 911
Write 1,094
Mixed 951
221% 985 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 32.4
104% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 596
403% 498 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 291%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
58GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.8
Write 7.7
Mixed 17.2
19% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.1
163% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMB6-DHDA1BAR08D00 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 10
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 32 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE0903
Typical Aspire Lite AL15-41 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Lite AL15-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback