Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire Lite AL15-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire Lite AL15-52  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Lite AL15-52
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240209
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 10 '24 at 11:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 156
2-Core 250
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 616
59% 487 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 4150) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 16.6
11% 15.7 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 12.5
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison ESO512GHLCA1-E9C 512GB
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 486 514 489 543 529 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,040
Write 564
Mixed 584
SusWrite 512
150% 675 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 44.8
179% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 590
DQ Mixed 634
468% 613 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 154%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO480E82-3200E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 17.7
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 10 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE0903
Typical Aspire Lite AL15-52 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Lite AL15-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback