Lenovo 21JTCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 21JTCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21JTCTO1WW
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240328
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 18:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 95
2-Core 148
55% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 426
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50D5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.10.24.11
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 29.3
15% 22 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 21.8
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 1089 1117 1186 1184 1184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,155
Write 1,189
Mixed 1,165
SusWrite 1,144
263% 1,163 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 46.5
144% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 816
520% 606 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 184%
Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 34.1" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical 21JTCTO1WW Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 21JTCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback