Skikk Freya II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSkikk Freya II  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU Freya II
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '24 at 12:52
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 136
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 360
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 51B1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4316
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.47% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 13
Parallax 11.1
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 10.3
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.47%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$105
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2437 2514 3141 2476 1500 1566 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,102
Write 3,845
Mixed 2,610
SusWrite 2,272
615% 2,707 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 85.9
299% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 641
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 472
362% 499 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 338%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-SKIKK48S516G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 42
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 19.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 5 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0984
Typical Freya II Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Skikk Freya II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback