Today's hottest deals

MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D48
MotherboardMSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '24 at 01:32
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-13100-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 179
2-Core 307
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 853
88% 710 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
MSI(1462 7D48) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 8.2
6% 10.3 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 0.1
5% 7.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 710 512GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 36 49 138 99 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69% Good
Read 422
Write 863
Mixed 268
SusWrite 77
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 19.5
100% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 612
400% 469 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FEA CT8G4DFS832A.M8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 28
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 24.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR064C KA241Y
Typical PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Builds (Compare 2,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO H610M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback