Today's hottest deals

Xiaomi Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemXiaomi Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU)  (all builds)
MotherboardXIAOMI TM2305
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240321
Uptime29.3 Days
Run DateMay 30 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 68.3
1-Core 194
2-Core 386
110% 216 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 766
100% 752 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D72 2305) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 21.6
14% 20.8 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 17
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ANXA0105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,854
Write 1,509
Mixed 1,111
331% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 76.3
252% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 522
401% 561 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6HX079 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 57.3
MC Write 65.2
MC Mixed 57.5
171% 60 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 23.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 151%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 17 120 16" 1707 996 BOE0C5D NE160QDM-NX3
Typical Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Xiaomi Redmi Book 16 2024 (Gen13 CPU)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback