Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502QA_M1502QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502QA_M1502QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1502QA
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateMay 31 '24 at 04:52
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 30.5
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 123
39% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 359
34% 282 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1AC3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.62
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 15
Parallax 30.5
6% 17.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 18.9
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 607 612 633 634 643 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 860
Write 643
Mixed 698
SusWrite 626
159% 707 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 24.2
83% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 310
209% 258 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 109%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.5
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502QA_M1502QA Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502QA_M1502QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback